
The Evolving Role of the Sustainability Officer: Managing risk, engagement, and accountability
09:00 MYT | 31 March 2026
Overview
What happens when sustainability moves from the margins of corporate reporting to the center of business strategy? Are sustainability teams still storytellers, or are they now risk managers navigating regulatory shifts, supply chain disruption, and rising scrutiny of corporate impacts on people and the environment? What is their role in a world of geopolitical tensions, and shrinking sustainability budgets?[1]
As sustainability expectations intensify, the role of the sustainability function is being redefined inside the boardroom.
The role of sustainability teams has always been defined by change and necessity. Born as a reaction to environmental and human rights disasters such as the Bhopal disaster and the Exxon Valdez oil leak, the role was seen as a way to safeguard operational environmental health and safety.[2] In the early 2000s, the function was largely focused on communicating the company’s “positive story” to stakeholders, and managing reputational risks.[3] Over time, the reactive and reputation management role, became compliance-oriented tied to sustainability reporting and disclosure. Today, it is increasingly centered on managing human rights and environmental risks, guiding corporate strategy, and helping companies navigate complex sustainability transitions – i.e. signaling a company’s competitiveness.
As legislation on corporate impacts on communities and the environment expands, sustainability teams are finding their skillsets broadening beyond reporting functions. They are now engaging directly with policymakers on emerging regulations, interpreting evolving human rights standards, and translating climate, biodiversity, and human rights indicators into operational risk management. Knowledge of environmental metrics alone is no longer sufficient; sustainability leaders must balance regulatory compliance, supply chain governance, and stakeholder engagement.
But in the boardroom, power imbalances exist, as sustainability teams seek to align company operations and processes in increasingly politicized boardrooms. Key questions remain: What is the return on investment on sustainability KPIs? What is the cost of reporting and addressing adverse human rights and environmental impacts? And what is the reputational risk of disclosing corporate footprints?
Considered a “vanishing job”, this roundtable examines how the role of the Chief Sustainability Officer is evolving in response to rising regulatory expectations, stakeholder scrutiny, and complex sustainability risks.
LEARN:
Examine how the sustainability function is evolving as companies undergo corporate restructuring, regulatory expectations expand, and rights-reporting shifts from disclosure to strategic risk management
ENGAGE:
Hear from industry leaders on the operational realities of embedding human and environmental rights into corporate strategy—navigating boardroom dynamics, budget pressures, and evolving responsibilities to demonstrate “competitiveness”
APPLY:
Exchange insights with corporate practitioners and decision-makers on what is needed to sustain impact: the skills, governance structures, and cross-functional collaboration
References
[1] https://www.eco-business.com/news/what-chief-sustainability-officers-fear-in-2026/
[3] https://hbr.org/2023/07/the-evolving-role-of-chief-sustainability-officers
SESSION SPEAKERS



